|
Name
Although these two Surahs of the
Qur'an are separate entities and are written in the Mushaf
also under separate names, yet they are so deeply related mutually
and their contents so closely resemble each other's that they have
been designated by a common name Mu'awwidhatayn (the two
Surahs in which refuge with Allah has been sought). Imam Baihaqi
in Dala'il an-Nubuwwat has written that these Surahs were
revealed together, that is why the combined name of both is
Mu'awwidhatayn. We are writing the same one Introduction to
both, for they discuss and deal with just the same matters and
topics. However, they will be explained and commented on
separately below.
Period of Revelation
Hadrat Hasan Basri, 'Ikrimah, 'Ata' and Jabir bin Zaid say that
these Surahs are Makki. A tradition from Hadrat 'Abdullah bin 'Abbas
also supports the same view. However, according to another
tradition from him, it is Madani and the same view is held also by
Hadrat 'Abdullah bin Zubair and Qatadah. One of the traditions
which strengthens this second view is the Hadith which
Muslim, Tirmidhi, Nasa'i and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal have related on
the authority of Hadrat 'Uqbah bin 'Amir. He says that the Holy
Prophet (upon whom be peach) one day said to him: "Do you know
what kind of verses have been revealed to me tonight? - these
matchless verses are A'udhu bi-Rabbil-falaq and
A'udhu bi-Rabbin-nas. This Hadith is used as an
argument for these Surahs to be Madani because Hadrat 'Uqbah bin 'Amir
had become a Muslim in Madinah after the hijrah, as
related by Abu Da'ud and Nasa'i on the basis of his own statement.
Other traditions which have lent strength to this view are those
related by Ibn Sa'd, Muhiyy-us-Sunnah Baghawi, Imam Nasafi, Imam
Baihaqi, Hafiz Ibn Hajar, Hafiz Badr-uddin 'Ayni, 'Abd bin Humaid
and others to the effect that these Surahs were revealed when the
Jews had worked magic on the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace) in
Madinah and he had fallen ill under its effect. Ibn Sa'd has
related on the authority of Waqidi that this happened in A.H. 7.
On this very basis Sufyan bin Uyainah also has described these
Surah as Madani.
But as we have
explained in the Introduction to Surah Al-Ikhlas, when it is said
about a certain Surah or verse that it was revealed on this or
that particular occasion, it does not necessarily mean that it was
revealed for the first time on that very occasion. Rather it
sometimes so happened that a Surah or a verse had previously been
revealed, then on the occurrence or appearance of a particular
incident or situation, the Holy Prophet's attention was drawn to
it by Allah for the second time, or even again and again. In our
opinion the same also was the case with the Mu'awwidhatayn.
The subject matter of these Surahs is explicit that these were
sent down at Makkah in the first instance when opposition to the
Holy Prophet there had grown very intense. Later, when at Madinah
storms of opposition were raised by the hypocrites, Jews and
polytheists, the Holy Prophet was instructed to recite these very
Surahs, as has been mentioned in the above cited tradition from
Hadrat Uqbah bin Amir. After this, when magic was worked on him,
and his illness grew intense, Gabriel came and instructed him by
Allah's command to recite these very Surahs. Therefore, in our
opinion, the view held by the commentators who describe both these
Surahs as Makki is more reliable. Regarding them as connected
exclusively with the incident of magic is difficult, for to this
incident related only one verse (v.4), the remaining verses of
Surah al Falaq and the whole of Surah An-Nas have nothing to do
with it directly.
Theme and Subject-Matter
The conditions under which these
two Surahs were sent down in Makkah were as follows. As soon as
the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace) began to preach the message
of Islam, it seemed as though he had provoked all classes of the
people around him. As his message spread the opposition of the
disbelieving Quraish also became more and more intense. As long as
they had any hope that they would be able to prevent him from
preaching his message by throwing some temptation in his way, or
striking some bargain with him, their hostility did not become
very active. But when the Holy Prophet disappointed them
completely that he would not effect any kind of compromise with
them in the matter of faith, and in Surah Al-Kafirun they were
plainly told: "I do not worship those who you worship nor are you
worshipers of Him Whom I worship. For you is your religion and for
me is mine", the hostility touched its extreme limits. More
particularly, the families whose members (men or women, boys or
girls) had accepted Islam, were burning with rage from within
against the Holy Prophet. They were cursing him, holding secret
consultations to kill him quietly in the dark of the night so that
the Bani Hashim could not discover the murderer and take revenge;
magic and charms were being worked on him so as to cause his
death, or make him fall ill, or become mad; satans from among the
men and the jinn spread on every side so as to whisper one or
another evil into the hearts of the people against him and the
Qur'an brought by him so that they became suspicious of him and
fled him. There were many people who were burning with jealousy
against him, for they could not tolerate that a man from another
family or clan than their own should flourish and become
prominent. For instance, the reason why Abu Jahl was crossing
every limit in his hostility to him has been explained by himself:
"We and the Bani Abdi Manaf (to which the Holy Prophet belonged)
were rivals of each other: they fed others, we too fed others;
they provided conveyances to the people, we too did the same; they
gave donations, we too gave donations, so much so that when they
and we have become equal in honor and nobility, they now proclaim
that they have a Prophet who is inspired from the heaven; how can
we compete with them in this field? By God, we will never
acknowledge him, nor affirm faith in him". (Ibn Hisham,
vol. I, pp. 337-338).
Such were the
conditions when the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace) was
commanded to tell the people: "I seek refuge with the Lord of the
dawn, from the evil of everything that He has created, and from
the evil of the darkness of night and from the evil of magicians,
men and women, and from the evil of the envious", and to tell
them: "I seek refuge with the Lord of mankind, the King of
mankind, and the Deity of mankind, from the evil of the whisperer,
who returns over and over again, who whispers (evil) into the
hearts of men, whether he be from among the jinn or men." This is
similar to what the Prophet Moses had been told to say when
Pharaoh had expressed his design before his full court to kill
him: "I have taken refuge with my Lord and your Lord against every
arrogant person who does not believe in the Day of Reckoning."
(Al-Mu'min: 27). And: "I have taken refuge with my Lord and your
Lord lest you should assail me." (Ad- Dukhan;20).
On both
occasions these illustrious Prophets of Allah were confronted with
well-equipped, resourceful and powerful enemies. On both occasions
they stood firm on their message of Truth against their strong
opponents, whereas they had no material power on the strength of
which they could fight them, and on both occasions they utterly
disregarded the threats and dangerous plans and hostile devices of
the enemy, saying: "We have taken refuge with the Lord of the
universe against you." Obviously, such firmness and steadfastness
can be shown only by the person who has the conviction that the
power of His Lord is the supreme power, that all powers of the
world are insignificant against Him, and that no one can harm the
one who has taken His refuge. Only such a one can say: "I will not
give up preaching the Word of Truth. I care the least for what you
may say or do, for I have taken refuge with my Lord and your Lord
and Lord of all universe."
Question whether Mu'awwidhatayn are, or are not,
Quranic
The above discussion is enough to
help one understand fully the theme and content of the two Surahs,
but since three points in the books of Hadith and
commentary concerning these Surahs have been discussed, which are
likely to create doubts in the minds, it is necessary to clear
them also here.
First, whether
it is absolutely established that these two Surahs are the
Qur'anic Surahs, or whether there is some doubt in this regard.
This question arose because in the traditions related from an
illustrious Companion like Hadrat Abdullah bin Mas'ud, it has been
said that he did not regard these two Surahs as the Surahs of the
Qur'an and had eliminated these from his copy of the Mushaf.
Imam Ahmad, Bazzar, Tabarani, Ibn Marduyah, Abu Ya'la, Abdullah
bin Ahmad bin Hanbal, Humaydi, Abu Nu'aim, Ibn Hibban and other
traditionists have related this from Hadrat Abdullah bin Mas'ud
with different chains of transmitters and mostly on sound
authority. According to these traditions, he not only eliminated
these Surahs from the Mushaf but it has also been
reported that he used to say: "Do not mix up with the Qur'an that
which is not of the Qur'an. These two Surahs are not included in
the Quran. This was only a command enjoined on the Holy Prophet
(upon whom be peace) for seeking God's refuge." In some traditions
there is also the addition that he did not recite these Surahs in
the Prayer.
On the basis of
these traditions the opponents of Islam had an opportunity to
raise doubts about the Qur'an, saying that this Book, God forbid,
is not free from corruption. For when, according to a Companion of
the rank of Hadrat Abdullah bin Mas'ud, these two Surahs are an
annexation to the Qur'an, many other additions and subtractions
also might have been made in it. To rid the Qur'an of this blame
Qadi Abu Bakr Al-Baqillani, Qadi Iyad and others took the stand
that Ibn Mas'ud was not in fact a denier of the Mu'awwidhatayn
being Qur'anic but only refused to write them in the Mushaf.
For, according to him, only that which the Holy Prophet (upon whom
be peace) had allowed, should be written in the Mushaf,
and Ibn Mas'ud did not receive the information that the Holy
Prophet had allowed this. But this stand is not correct, for
according to sound evidence, it is confirmed that Ibn Mas'ud (may
Allah be pleased with him) had denied that these were Surahs of
the Qur'an. Some other scholars, for instance, Imam Nawawi, Imam
Ibn Hazm and Imam Fakhr-ud-din Razi, regard this as a pure lie and
falsehood that Ibn Mas'ud had asserted any such thing. But to
reject genuine historical facts without sound evidence is
unscientific.
Now, the
question is: How can the blame that attaches to the Qur'an because
of these traditions of Ibn Mas'ud correctly refuted? This question
has several answers which we shall give below in sequence:
1.
Hafiz Bazzar after
relating these traditions of Ibn Mas'ud in his Musnad,
has written that he is solitary and isolated in his this opinion;
no one from among the Companions has supported this view.
2.
The copies of the
Qur'an which the third Caliph, Hadrat Uthman (may Allah be pleased
with him), had got compiled by the consensus of the Companions and
which he had sent from the Islamic Caliphate officially to the
centers of the world of Islam contained both these Surahs.
3.
The Mushaf
which, since the sacred time of the Holy Prophet (upon whom be
peace) till today, has the seal of consensus of the entire world
of Islam, contains both these Surahs. The solitary opinion of only
Abdullah bin Mas'ud, in spite of his high rank, has no weight
against this great consensus.
4.
It is confirmed by
sound and reliable ahadith from the Holy Prophet (upon
whom be peace) that he not only recited these Surahs in the Prayer
himself but instructed others also to recite them, and taught them
to the people as the Surahs of the Qur'an. Consider, for instance,
the following ahadith:
We have cited
on the authority of Muslim, Ahmad, Tirmidhi and Nasai the
tradition of Hadrat Uqbah bin Amir that the Holy Prophet told him
about Surah Al-Falaq and Surah An- Nas, saying that those verses
had been revealed to him that night. A tradition in Nasai from
Uqbah bin Amir is to the effect that the Holy Prophet (upon whom
be peace) recited both these Surahs in the Morning Prayer. Imam
Ahmad on sound authority has related in his Musnad the
tradition from a Companion that the Holy Prophet said to him,
"When you perform the Prayer, recite both these Surahs in it." In
Musnad Ahmad, Abu Daud and Nasai this tradition of Uqbah bin Amir
has been related: "The Holy Prophet said to him: Should I not
teach you two such Surahs as are among the best Surahs that the
people recite? He said: Do teach me, O Messenger of Allah.
Thereupon the Holy Prophet taught him the Mu'awwidhatayn.
Then the Prayer began and the Holy Prophet recited the same two
Surahs in it also, and when after the Prayer the Holy Prophet
passed by him, he said to him, 'O Uqbah, how did you like it?'
Then he instructed him to the effect: When you go to bed, and when
you get up from bed, recite these Surahs." In Musnad Ahmad, Abu
Da'ud, Tirmidhi and Nasa'i there is a tradition from Uqbah bin
Amir, saying that the Holy Prophet exhorted him to recite the
Mu'awwidhat (i.e. Qul Huwa Allahu ahad and the
Mu'awwidhatayn) after every Prayer. Nasai, Ibn Marduyah and
Hakim have related this tradition also from Uqbah bin Amir: "Once
the Holy Prophet was riding on a conveyance and I was walking
along with him with my hand placed on his sacred foot. I said:
Kindly teach me Surah Hud or Surah Yusuf. He replied: In the sight
of Allah there is nothing more beneficial for the servant than
Qul a'udhu bi-Rabbil-falaq." A tradition from Abdullah bin
Abid al-Juhani has been related by Nasai, Baihaqi and Ibn Sad,
saying that the Holy Prophet said to him: "Ibn Abid, should I not
tell you what are the best things out of the means by which the
seekers of refuge have sought refuge with Allah? I submitted: Do
teach me, O Messenger of Allah. He replied: Qul a'udhu bi-Rabbil-
falaq and Qul a-udhu bi Rabbin-nas - both these
Surahs." Ibn Marduyah had related from Hadrat Umm Salamah: "The
Surahs best liked by Allah are: Qul a'udhu bi-Rabbil-falaq
and Qul a'udhu bi-Rabbin-nas."
Here, the
question arises: what caused Hadrat Abdullah bin Mas'ud the
misunderstanding that these two are not Surahs of the Qur'an? We
get the answer to it when we combine two traditions: first, that
Hadrat Abdullah bin Mas'ud asserted that this was only a command
which the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace) was given to teach him
the method of seeking refuge with Allah; second, the tradition
which Imam Bukhari has related in his Sahih, Imam Ahmad
in his Musnad, Hafiz Abu Bakr al- Humaidi in his
Musnad, Abu Nu'aim in his Al-Mustakhraj and Nasai in
his Sunan, with different chains of transmitters, on the
authority of Zirr bin Hubaish, with a slight variation in wording
from Hadrat Ubayy bin Kab, who held a distinguished place among
the Companions on the basis of his knowledge of the Qur'an. Zirr
bin Hubaish states: "I said to Hadrat Ubayy: Your brother,
Abdullah bin Mas'ud, says these things. What do you say about this
view? He replied: I had questioned the Holy Prophet (upon whom be
peace) about this. He said to me: I was told to say 'qul',
so I said 'qul'. Therefore, we too say the same as the
Holy Prophet said." In the tradition related by Imam Ahmad, Hadrat
Ubayy's words are to the effect: "I bear witness that the Holy
Prophet (upon whom be peace) told me that Gabriel (peace be on
him) had told him to say: Qul a'udhu bi-Rabbil-falaq;
therefore, he recited likewise, and Gabriel asked him to say:
Qul a'udhu bi- Rabbin-nas; therefore he too said likewise.
Hence, we too say as the Holy Prophet said." A little
consideration of these two traditions will show that the word
qul (say) in the two Surahs caused Hadrat Abdullah bin Mas'ud
the misunderstanding that the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace)
had been commanded to say: A'udhu bi-Rabbil-falaq and
A'udhu bi-Rabbin-nas. But he did not feel any need to
question the Holy Prophet about it. In the mind of Hadrat Ubbay
bin Kab also a question arose about his and he put it before the
Holy Prophet. The Holy Prophet replied: "Since Gabriel (peace be
on him) had said qul, so I too say qul." Let us
put it like this. If somebody is commanded and asked: "Say, I seek
refuge", he will not carry out the command, saying: "Say, I seek
refuge", but he will drop the work "say" and say: "I seek refuge."
On the contrary, if the messenger of a superior officer conveys to
somebody the message in these words: "Say, I seek refuge", and
this command is given to him not only for his own person but to be
conveyed to others, he will convey the words of the message
verbatim to the people, and will not have the permission to drop
anything from the text of the message. Thus, the fact that these
two Surahs begin with the word qul is a clear proof that
it is Divine Word, which the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace) was
bound to convey verbatim. It was not merely a command given to him
for his person. Besides these two Surahs, there are 330 other
verses in the Qur'an which begin with the word qul (say).
The presence of qul in all these is a proof that it is
Divine Wprd. which was obligatory for the Holy Prophet to convey
verbatim; otherwise if qul everywhere had meant a
command, the Holy Prophet would have dropped it and said only that
which he was commanded to say, and it would not have been recorded
in the Qur'an, but, on the contrary, he would have remained
content with saying only what he was commanded to say.
Here, if one
considers this, one can understand fully well how unreasonable it
is to regard the Companions as infallible and to make the clamor
that a Companion has been defamed as soon as one hears a saying or
doing of his being described as wrong. Here, one can clearly see
what a blunder happened to be committed by an illustrious
Companion like Hadrat Abdullah bin Mas'ud about two Surahs of the
Qur'an. If such an error could be committed by an eminent
Companion like him, others also might commit an error. We can
examine it in the scientific way, and describe it as wrong if a
thing said or done by a Companion is proved to be wrong. But
wicked indeed would be the person who went beyond describing a
wrong act as wrong and started reproving and finding fault with
the Companions of the Holy Prophet of Allah. Concerning the
Mu'awwidhatayn the commentators and traditionists have
described the opinion of Ibn Mas'ud as wrong, but no one has dared
to say that by denying these two Surahs of the Qur'an, he had, God
forbid, become a disbeliever.
Question of Holy
Prophet's being affected by Magic
The second
thing that has arisen in respect of these two Surahs is that,
according to traditions, magic had been worked on the Holy
Prophet, and he had fallen ill under its effect, and Gabriel
(peace be on him) had instructed him to repeat these Surahs to
remove the charm. This has been objected to by many rationalists
of both ancient and modern times. They say that if these
traditions are accepted, the whole Shari'ah becomes
doubtful. For if the Prophet could be charmed, and according to
these traditions he was charmed, one cannot say what the Prophet
might have been made to say and do under the influence of magic by
his opponents, and what in his teaching may be Divine and what the
result of magic. Not only this: they also allege that if this is
accepted as true, it might well be that the Prophet might have
been prompted to make the claim to Prophethood through magic and
the Prophet by misunderstanding might have thought that an angel
had come to him. They also argue that these traditions clash with
the Qur'an. The Qur'an mentions the accusation of the disbelievers
who said that the Prophet was bewitched (Bani Isra'il:47), but
these traditions confirm the accusation of the disbelievers that
the Prophet had actually been charmed and bewitched.
For a proper
investigation of this question it is necessary that one should
first see whether it is established by authentic historical
evidence that the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace) had actually
been affected by magic, and if so, what it was and to what extent.
Then it should be seen whether the objections raised against what
is established historically do actually apply to it or not.
The Muslim
scholars of the earliest period were truly honest and upright in
that they did not try to corrupt history or conceal facts
according to their own ideas, concepts and assumptions. They
conveyed intact to the later generations whatever was confirmed
historically, and did not at all care how the material supplied by
them could be used by the one who was bent upon drawing perverse
conclusions from the facts. Now, if something stands confirmed by
authentic and historical means, it is neither right for an honest
and right-minded person that he should deny history on the ground
that in case he accepted it, it would lead to these evil results
according to his thinking, nor it is right that he should add to
and stretch beyond its genuine limits by conjecture and
speculation whatever is established historically. Instead, he
should accept history as history and then see what is actually
proved by it and what is not.
As far as the
historical aspect is concerned, the incident of the Holy Prophet's
being affected by magic is absolutely confirmed, and if it can be
refuted by scientific criticism, then no historical event of the
world can be proved right and genuine. It has been related by
Bukhari, Muslim, Nasai, Ibn Majah, Imam Ahmad, Abdur Razzaq,
Humaidi, Baihaqi, Tabarani, Ibn Sad, Ibn Mardayah, Ibn Abi Shaibah,
Hakim, Abd bin Humaid and other traditionists on the authority of
Hadrat Aishah, Hadrat Zaid bin Arqam and Hadrat Abdullah bin Abbas,
through so many different and numerous channels that forgery is
out of the question. Although each tradition by itself is an
isolated report (khabar wahid), we give it below as a
connected event from the details provided by the traditions.
After the peace
treaty of Hudaibiyah when the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace)
returned to Madinah, a deputation of the Jews of Khaibar visited
Madinah in Muharram, A.H. 7 and met a famous magician, Labid bin
Asam, who belonged to the Ansar tribe of Bani Zurayq. They said to
him: "You know how Muhammad (upon whom be Allah's peace and
blessings) has treated us. We have tried our best to bewitch him
but have not succeeded. Now we have come to you because you are a
more skilled magician. Here are three gold coins, accept these and
cast a powerful magic spell on Muhammad." In those days the Holy
Prophet had a Jewish boy as his attendant. Through him they
obtained a piece of the Holy Prophet's comb with some hair stuck
to it. Magic was worked on the same hair and the teeth of the
comb. According to some traditions, magic was worked by Labid bin
Asam himself, according to others, his sisters were more skilled
than him and he got the spell cast through them. Whatever be the
case, Labid placed this spell in the spathe of a male date-tree
and his it under a stone at the bottom of Dharwan or Dhi Arwan,
the well of Bani Zurayq. The spell took one whole year to have
effect upon the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace). In the latter
half of the year the Holy Prophet started feeling as if was
unwell. The last forty days became hard on him, of which the last
three days were even harder. But its maximum effect on him was
that he way melting away from within. He thought he had done a
thing whereas, in fact, he had not done it: he thought he had
visited his wives whereas he had not visited them; and sometimes
he would doubt having seen something whereas, in fact, he had not
seen it. All these effects were confined to his own person; so
much so that the other people could not notice what state he was
passing through. As for his being a Prophet, no change occurred in
the performance of his duties. There is no tradition to say that
he might have forgotten some verses of the Qur'an in those days,
or might have recited a verse wrongly, or a change might have
occurred in the assemblies and in his counsels and sermons, or he
might have presented a discourse as Revelation which may not have
been revealed to him, or he might have missed a Prayer and thought
that he had performed it. God forbid, if any such thing had
happened, it would have caused a clamor and the whole of Arabia
would have known that a magician had overpowered the one whom no
power had been able to overpower. But the Holy Prophet's position
as a Prophet remained wholly unaffected by it. Only in his
personal life he remained worried on account of it. At last, one
day when he was in the house of Hadrat Aishah, he prayed to Allah
to be restored to full health. In the meantime he fell asleep or
drowsed and on waking he said to Hadrat Aishah: "My Lord has told
me what I had asked of Him." Hadrat Aishah asked what it was. He
replied: "Two men (i.e. two angels in human guise) came to me. One
sat near my head and the other near my feet. The first asked: what
has happened to him? The other replied: Magic has been worked on
him. The first asked: who has worked it? He replied: Labid bin
Asam. He asked: In what is it contained? He replied: In the comb
and hair covered in the spathe of a male date-tree. He asked:
where is it? He replied: under a stone at the bottom of Dhi Arwan
(or Dharwan), the well of Bani Zurayq. He asked: what should be
done about it? He replied: the well should be emptied and it
should be taken out from under the stone. The Holy Prophet then
sent Hadrat Ali, Hadrat Ammar bin Yasir and Hadrat Zubair: They
were also joined by Jubair bin Iyas az-Zurqi (two men from Bani
Zurayq). Later the Holy Prophet also arrived at the well along
with some Companions. The water was taken out and the spathe
recovered. There they found that beside the comb and hair there
was a cord with eleven knots on it and a wax image with needles
pricked into it. Gabriel (peace be on him) came and told him to
repeat the Mu'awwidhatayn. As he repeated verse after
verse, a know was loosened and a needle taken out every time, till
on finishing the last words all the knots were loosened and all
the needles removed, and he was entirely freed from the charm.
After this he called Labid and questioned him. He confessed his
guilt and the Holy Prophet let him go, for he never avenged
himself on anyone for any harm done to his person. He even
declined to talk about it to others, saying that Allah had
restored him to health; therefore he did not like that he should
incite the people against anyone.
This is the
story of the magic worked on the Holy Prophet. There if nothing in
it which might run counter to his office of Prophethood. In his
personal capacity if any injury could be inflicted on him as it
happened in the Battle of Uhud, if he could fall from his horse
and be hurt as is confirmed by the Hadith, if he could be
stung by a scorpion as has been mentioned in some Traditions and
none of these negates the protection promised him by Allah in his
capacity as a Prophet, he could also fall ill under the influence
of magic in his personal capacity. That a Prophet can be affected
by magic is also confirmed by the Qur'an. In Surah Al- A'raf it
has been said about the magicians of Pharaoh that when they
confronted the Prophet Moses, they bewitched the eyes of thousands
of people who had assembled to witness the encounter (v. 116). In
Surah Ta Ha it has been said that not only the common people but
the Prophet Moses too felt that the cords and staffs that they
cast were running towards them like so many snakes, and this
filled Moses' heart with fear. Thereupon Allah revealed to him:
"Don't fear for you will come out victorious. Cast down you
staff." (vv. 66-69). As for the objection that this then confirms
the accusation of the disbelievers of Makkah that the Holy Prophet
(upon whom be peace) was a bewitched man, its answer is that the
disbelievers did not call him a bewitched man in the sense that he
had fallen ill under that effect of magic cast by somebody, but in
the sense that some magician has, God forbid, made him mad, and he
had made claim to Prophethood and was telling the people tales of
Hell and Heaven in his same madness. Now, obviously this objection
does not at all apply to a matter about which history confirms
that the magic spell had affected only the person of Muhammad
(upon whom be peace) and not the Prophethood of Muhammad (upon
whom be peace), which remained wholly unaffected by it.
In this
connection, another thing worthy of mention is that the people who
regard magic as a kind of superstition hold this view only because
the effect of magic cannot be explained scientifically. But there
are many things in the world which one experiences and observes
but one cannot explain scientifically how they happen. If we
cannot give any such explanation it does not become necessary that
we should deny the thing itself which we cannot explain. Magic, in
fact, is a psychological phenomenon which can affect the body
through the mind just as physical things affect the mind through
the body. Fear, for instance, is a psychological phenomenon, but
it affects the body: the hair stand on end and the body shudders.
Magic does not; in fact, change the reality, but under its
influence man's mind and senses start feeling as if reality had
changed. The staffs and the cords that the magicians had thrown
towards the Prophet Moses, had not actually become snakes, but the
eyes of the multitude of people were so bewitched that everybody
felt they were snakes; even the senses of the Prophet Moses could
not remain unaffected by the magic spell. Likewise, in Al-Baqarah:
102, it has been said that in Babylon people learnt such magic
from Harut and Marut as could cause division between husband and
wife. This too was a psychological phenomenon. Obviously, if the
people did not find it efficacious by experience they could not
become its customers. No doubt, it is correct that just like the
bullet of the rifle and the bomb from the aircraft, magic too
cannot have effect without Allah's permission, but it would be
mere stubbornness to deny a thing which has been experienced and
observed by man for thousands for years.
Question of Reciting Charms and Amulets in Islam
The third thing that arises in
connection with these Surahs is whether recitation of charms and
amulets has any place in Islam, and whether such recitation is by
itself efficacious or not. This question arises for in many
ahadith it has been reported that the Holy Prophet (upon whom
be peace) at the time of going to bed every night, especially
during illness, used to recite the Mu'awwidhatayn (or according to
other reports, the Mu'awwidhat, i.e. Qul Huwa-Allahu
Ahad and the Mu'awwidhatayn) thrice, blow in his
hands and then rub the hands on his body from head to foot as far
as his hands could reach. During his last illness when it was not
longer possible for him to so do, Hadrat Aishah recited these
Surahs herself or by his command blew on his hands in view of
their being blessed and rubbed them on his body. Traditions on
this subject have been related in Bukhari, Muslim, Nasai, Ibn
Majah, Abu Da'ud and Mu'atta of Imam Malik through authentic
channels on the authority of Hadrat Aishah herself beside whom no
one could be better acquainted with the domestic life of the Holy
Prophet.
In this regard,
one should first understand its religious aspect. In the
Hadith a lengthy tradition has been related on the authority
of Hadrat Abdullah bin Abbas, at the end of which the Holy Prophet
is reported to have said: "The people of my Ummah to
enter Paradise without reckoning will be those who neither turn to
treatment by branding, nor to enchanting, nor take omens, but have
trust in their Lord." (Muslim). According to a tradition reported
on the authority of Hadrat Mughirah bin Shubah, the Holy Prophet
said: "He who got himself treated by branding, or enchanting,
became independent of trust in Allah." (Tirmidhi). Hadrat Abdullah
bin Mas'ud has reported that the Holy Prophet disapproved of ten
things one of which was recitation of charms and amulets except by
means of the Mu'awwidhatayn or Mu'awwidhat. (Abu
Daud, Ahmad, Nasai, Ibn Hibban, Hakim). Some ahadith also
show that in the beginning the Holy Prophet had altogether
forbidden recitation of charms and amulets, but later he allowed
it on the condition that is should not smack of polytheism, but
one should recite and blow by means of the holy names of Allah, or
the words of the Qur'an. The words used should be understandable
and one should know that there is nothing sinful in it, and one
should not wholly rely on the recitation of charms but on Allah's
will to make it beneficial." After the explanation of the
religious aspect, let us now see what the Hadith says in
this regard.
Tabarani in As-Saghir
has related a tradition on the authority of Hadrat Ali, saying:
"One the Holy Prophet was stung by a scorpion during the Prayer.
When the Prayer was over, he remarked: God's curse be on the
scorpion: it neither spares a praying one, nor any other. Then he
called for water and salt, and started rubbing the place where the
scorpion had stung with salt water and reciting Qul ya
ayyuhal-kafirun, Qul Huwa Allahu ahad, Qul
a'udhu bi-Rabbil-falaq and Qul a'udhu bi-Rabbin-nas,
along with it."
Ibn Abbas also
has related a tradition to the effect: "The Holy Prophet (upon
whom be peace) used to recite this invocation over Hadrat Hasan
and Husain: U'idhu kuma bi-kalimat Allahit-tamati min kulli
shaitan-in wa hammati-wa min kulli ayt-in-lam nati: "I give
you in the refuge of Allah's blameless words, from every devil and
troublesome thing, and from every evil look." (Bukhari, Musnad
Ahmad, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah).
A tradition has
been related in Muslim, Muwatta, Tabarani and Hakim about Uthman
bin al-As ath-Thaqafi, with a little variation in wording, to the
effect that he complained to the Holy Prophet (upon whom be
peace), saying: "Since I have become a Muslim, I feel a pain in my
body, which is killing me." The Holy Prophet said: "Place your
right hand on the place where you feel the pain, then recite
Bismillah thrice, and A'udhu billahi wa qudratihi min
sharri ma ajidu wa uhadhiru ("I seek refuge with Allah and
with His power from the evil that I find and that I fear") seven
times, and rub your hand." In Muwatta there is the
addition: "Uthman bin Abi al-As said: After that my pain
disappeared and now I teach the same formula to the people of my
house."
Musnad Ahmad
and Tahavi contain this tradition from Talq bin Ali: "I was stung
by a scorpion in the presence of the Holy Prophet (upon whom be
peace). The Holy Prophet recited something and blew over me and
rubbed his hand on the affected place."
Muslim contains
a tradition from Abu Said Khudri, which says: "Once when the Holy
Prophet (upon whom be peace) fell ill, Gabriel came and asked: O
Muhammad, are you ill? The Holy Prophet answered in the
affirmative. Gabriel said: I blow on you in the name of Allah from
everything which troubles you and from the evil of every soul and
the evil look of every envier. May Allah restore you to health. I
blow on you in His name." A similar tradition has been related in
Musnad Ahmad on the authority of Hadrat Ubadah bin as-Samit, which
says: "The Holy Prophet was unwell. I went to visit him and found
him in great trouble. When I re-visited him in the evening I found
him quite well. When I asked how he had become well so soon, he
said: Gabriel came and blew over me with some words. Then he
recited words similar to those reported in the above Hadith.
A tradition similar to this has been related on the authority of
Hadrat Aishah also in Muslim and Musnad Ahmad.
Imam Ahmad in
his Musnad has related this tradition from Hafsah, mother
of the Faithful: "One day the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace)
visited me in the house and a woman, named Shifa, was sitting with
me. She used to blow on the people to cure them of blisters. The
Holy Prophet said to her: Teach Hafsah also the formula." Imam
Ahmad, Abu Daud and Nasai have related this tradition from Shifa
bint Abdullah herself, saying: "The Holy Prophet said to me: Just
as you have taught Hafsah reading and writing, so teach her
blowing to cure blisters as well."
In Muslim there
is a tradition from Auf bin Malik al-Ashjal to the effect: "We
used to practise blowing to cure diseases. We asked the Holy
Prophet (upon whom be peace) for his opinion in this regard. He
said: Let me know the words with which you blow over the people.
There is no harm in blowing unless it smacks of polytheism."
Muslim, Musnad
Ahmad and Ibn Majah contain a tradition from Hadrat Jabir bin
Abdullah, saying: "The Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace) had
forbidden us blowing to cure disease. Then the people of the clan
of Hadrat Amr bin Hazm came and they said: We had a formula with
which we used to blow on the people to cure them of scorpion's
sting (or snake-bite). But you have forbidden us the practice.
Then they recited before him the words which they made use of.
Thereupon the Holy Prophet said: I do not see any harm in it, so
let the one who can do good to his brother, do him good." Another
tradition from Jabir bin Abdullah in Muslim is: "The family of
Hazm had a formula to cure snake-bite and the Holy Prophet
permitted them to practise it." This is also supported by the
tradition from Hadrat Aishah, which is contained in Muslim, Musnad
Ahmad, and Ibn Majah: "The Holy Prophet granted permission to a
family of the Ansar for blowing to cure the evils effects of
biting by every poisonous creature." Traditions resembling these
have been related from Hadrat Anas also in Musnad Ahmad, Tirmidhi,
Muslim and Ibn Majah, saying that the Holy Prophet gave permission
for blowing to cure the bite by poisonous creatures, the disease
of blisters and the effects of the evil look."
Musnad Ahmad,
Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah and Hakim have related this tradition on the
authority of Hadrat Umair, freed slave of Abi al-Laham: "In the
pre-Islamic days I had a formula with which I used to blow over
the people. I recited it before the Holy Prophet, whereupon he
told me to drop out such and such words from it, and permitted me
to blow with the rest of it."
According to
Muwatta, Hadrat Abu Bakr went to the house of his
daughter, Hadrat Aishah, and found that she was unwell and a
Jewish woman was blowing over her. Thereupon he said to her: "Blow
over her by means of the Book of Allah." This shows that if the
people of the Book practise blowing by means of the verses of the
Torah and the Gospel, it is also permitted.
As for the
question whether blowing for curing disease is efficacious also,
or not, its answer is that the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace)
not only did not forbid anybody to have recourse to cure and
medical treatment but himself stated that Allah has created a cure
for every disease and exhorted his followers to use cures. He
himself told the people the remedies for certain diseases, as can
be seen in the Hadith in the Kitab at-Tib (Book of
Cures). But the cure can be beneficial and useful only by Allah's
command and permission, otherwise if the cure and medical
treatment were beneficial in every case, no one would have died in
hospitals. Now, if beside the cure and medical treatment, Allah's
Word and His beautiful names also are made use of, or Word and His
beautiful names also are made use of, or Allah is turned to and
invoked for help by means of His Word, Names and Attributes in a
place where no medical aid is available, it would not be against
reason except for the materialists. However, it is not right to
disregard intentionally a cure or treatment where it is available,
and recourse had only to enchanting and reciting of charms, and
the people should start a regular practice of granting amulets as
a means of earning their livelihood.
Many people in
this regard argue from Hadrat Abu Said Khudri's tradition which
has been related in Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi, Musnad Ahmad, Abu
Daud and Ibn Majah, and it is supported also by a tradition
related in Bukhari on the authority of Ibn Abbas. According to it
the Holy Prophet sent some of his Companions including Hadrat Abu
Said Khudri on an expedition. They halted on the way at the
settlement of an Arabian tribe and demanded hospitality from the
people, but they refused to extend any hospitality. In the
meantime the chief of the tribe was stung by a scorpion and the
people came to the travelers to ask if they had any medicine or
formula by which their chief could be cured. Hadrat Abu Said said:
"Yes, we do have, but since you have refused us hospitality, we
would not treat him unless you promised us to give us something."
They promised to give them a flock of goats (according to some
traditions, 30 goats), and Hadrat Abu Said went and started
reciting Surah Al-Fatihah and rubbing his saliva on the affected
place. Consequently, the chief felt relieved of the effect of the
poison and the people of the tribe gave them the goats as
promised. But the Companions said to one another; "Let us not make
any use of the goats until we have asked the Holy Prophet about
it", for they were not sure whether it was permissible to accept
any reward for what they had done. So they came before the Holy
Prophet and related what had happened. The Holy Prophet smiled and
said: "How did you know that Surah Al-Fatihah could also be used
for curing such troubles? Take the goats and allocate my share
also in it."
But before one
used this Hadith for permission to adopt a regular
profession of granting amulets and reciting charms, one should
keep in view the conditions under which Hadrat Abu Said Khudri had
recourse to it, and the Holy Prophet not only held it as
permissible but also said that a share for him also should be
allocated so that there remained no doubt in the minds of the
Companions that such a thing was permissible. The conditions in
Arabia in those days were, as they still are, that settlements
were situated hundreds of miles apart, there were not hotels and
restaurants where a traveler could buy food when he reached one of
these after several days' journey. Under such conditions it was
considered a moral duty that when a traveler reached a settlement
the people of the place should extend hospitality to him. Refusal
on their part in many cases meant death for the travelers, and
this was looked upon as highly blameworthy among the Arabs. That
is why the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace) allowed as
permissible the act of his Companions. Since the people of the
tribe had refused them hospitality, they too refused to treat
their chief, and became ready to treat him only on the condition
that they should promise to give them something in return. Then,
when one of them with trust in God recited Surah Al-Fatihah over
the chief and he became well, the people gave the promised wages
and the Holy Prophet allowed that the wages be accepted as lawful
and pure. In Bukhari the tradition related on the authority of
Hadrat Abdullah bin Abbas about this incident contains the Holy
Prophet's words to the effect: "Instead that you should have acted
otherwise, it was better that you recited the Book of Allah and
accepted the wages for it." He said this in order to impress the
truth that Allah's Word is superior to every other kind of
enchanting and practice of secret arts. Furthermore, the Message
also was incidentally conveyed to the Arabian tribe and its people
made aware of the blessings of the Word that the Holy Prophet
(upon whom be peace) had brought from Allah. This incident cannot
be cited as a precedent for the people who run clinic in the
cities and towns for the practice of secret arts and have adopted
it as a regular profession for earning livelihood. No precedent of
it is found in the life and practice of the Holy Prophet (upon
whom be peace) or his Companions, their followers and the earliest
Imams.
Relation between Surah Al-Fatihah and the Mu'awwidhatayn
The last thing which is note worthy with regard to the
Mu'awwidhatayn is the relation between the beginning and the
end of the Qur'an. Although the Qur'an has not been arranged
chronologically, the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace) arranged in
the present order the verses and Surahs revealed during 23 years
on different occasions to meet different needs and situations not
by himself but by the command of Allah Who revealed them.
According to this order, the Qur'an opens with the Surah Al-Fatihah
and ends with the Mu'awwidhatayn. Now, let us have a look
at the two. In the beginning, after praising and glorifying Allah,
Who is Lord of the worlds, Kind, Merciful and Master of the
Judgment Day, the servants submits: "Lord, You alone I worship and
to You along I turn for help, and the most urgent help that I need
from You is to be guided to the Straight Way." In answer, he is
given by Allah the whole Qur'an to show him the Straight Way,
which is concluded thus: Man prays to Allah, Who is Lord of dawn,
Lord of men, King of men, Deity of men, saying: "I seek refuge
only with You for protection from every evil and mischief of every
creature, and in particular, from the evil whisperings of devils,
be they from among men or jinn, for they are the greatest obstacle
in following the Straight Way." The relation that the beginning
bears with the end, cannot remain hidden from anyone who has
understanding and insight. |